“The Guest” was an interesting read. There wasn’t a whole lot to the plot; it basically stayed in one place without any sort of rise or fall. Though the story wasn’t filled with suspense, it was still structured in a way that made me pay attention to the story and intrigued me in a way. One of my main questions while reading was, why did Daru refuse upfront to take the Arab man to the prison even though it was clear that the man had committed a crime.
It is my normal tendency to take the side of the protagonist or narrator when I read anything. I thought it was odd at first that Daru immediately refused to turn in a man that had already admitted to murdering his brother; however, I gave Daru the benefit of the doubt and I figured I would eventually come across the reason behind his actions as the story progressed. Unfortunately, I never fully understood his reasoning even after the story concluded. On the other hand, I also wanted to defend the Arab man, even though he was a killer. There was something about his quiet and reserved nature that showed some sort of innocence and naiveté in his character. I believe that Daru saw the same innocence in him from the beginning, though he was always very aware of the prisoner in case he turned out to be a silent killer. The Arab man turned out to be as honest and innocent as he seemed to be after choosing to continue on to the prison even though Daru tried to direct him towards freedom.
One of the reasons why I think that the Arab man turned himself in instead of running away has something to do with one of Daru’s earlier thoughts. That even in the drought and the terrible conditions Daru was facing he did not run away because “Daru had been born here. Everywhere else, he felt exiled” (Camus 173). I believe that this quote also pertained to the Arab man when he made the decision to go to the prison. He possibly felt even though he would be in prison for however long his punishment would last, he would rather be in his home country than roaming around with a group of nomads who have no place to call home.
There was a little bit of irony towards the end of the story when the Arab man’s brothers wrote on the chalk board condemning the man who turned him in. It was a little bit unsettling when I first read those words, especially knowing that now Daru will most likely die even though he tried to the right thing by setting the man free. The scene reemphasizes Darus’s aloneness, considering how he has lived alone for such a long time and will now have to face death alone.
Camus used Darus’s surroundings and everyday life to emphasize just how alone the schoolmaster was. He lived on top of a plateau, which was barren and empty due to an 8 month drought. He had been alone for days since the school was closed for the sudden snow. Darus even thinks about how he hardly has any guests, and how he had trouble sleeping because he wasn’t used to sharing a room with another man. One thing I observed was that however much alone Darus was, he didn’t seem lonely. He didn’t even want to consider the companionship that often happens when sharing a room with another man. I believe that Darus was content with his monk-like life.
Hi Christy, Good comments on the story. True, there is not a lot of action as in an adventure story, but the tension is embedded in the three characters. I am not sure the Arab goes on to prison, and quite possibly death through execution, because he would still be in his homeland, though I agree his fear of exile has something to do with his decision. Perhaps he simply refused to accept the choice Daru offered, preferring to believe that he did not have a choice. I look forward to our discussion. thanks, dw
ReplyDelete